Structuring Communication Processes and Enhancing Public Discourse: The Delphi Method Revisited
نویسندگان
چکیده
Increased advances in communication technology have enabled computermediated communication among geographically dispersed individuals, and created opportunities for them to participate in socio-political decisions at the local, national and global level. Consequently, the structuring of communication processes for facilitating discourse among larger groups of individuals becomes a challenge. Delphi is one of the most used methods for structuring group communication among experts. This paper theoretically evaluates the usability of Delphi for discourses among larger groups from the perspective of various public discourse criteria, which are endorsed by public discourse models in modern democracies. Our assessment of Delphi suggests that Delphi is in principle open for the realization of several discourse conventions in practice. The paper also discusses the value of the implementation of Delphi-like structures in a Social Decision Support System (SDSS) and provides some suggestions for future research. The copyright of this paper belongs to the paper’s authors. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage. Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2004) Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, June 2-3, 2004 (M. Aakhus, M. Lind, eds.) www.scils.rutgers.edu/lap04/lap04.htm
منابع مشابه
Legitimation in Discourse and Communication Revisited: A Critical View towards Legitimizing Identities in Communication
The various and multifaceted wars in the Middle East have brought about weird complications in the already challenging multifarious international relations and interactions. The media coverage of terroristic threats in the Middle East and the European countries as well as United States has often targeted Muslim identity. The present study is aimed at analyzing Barack Obama's speech at Baltimore...
متن کاملCommunication Strategies Revisited: Looking beyond Interactional and Psycholinguistic Perspectives
Second language (L2) communication strategies (CSs) have traditionally been dealt with through either interactional or psychological perspectives. However, this paper is a critical attempt to question the status of the particular kinds of psycholinguistic and interactional approaches that currently dominate the field of second language acquisition (SLA). In this way, it expands the significance...
متن کاملHealth System Governance in Iran: A Delphi Study
Background and Aim: Good governance results in better health outcomes for the society thorugh improving health system performance. The governance of Iran health stsyem faces some challenges. Hence, this study aimed to propose and verify a model for strengthening Iranian health system governance. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in 2016 using the Delphi method. A heal...
متن کاملCan Scaffolding Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Facilitate the Transfer of Genre-based Knowledge to Another Discourse Mode?
A pivotal issue in research on writing concerns whether the knowledge of how genres are constructed and learned in one discipline/genre can be transferred to other contexts, genres, and disciplines. Yet, studies conducted so far have not presented a unified and complete view of how various writing instructional techniques can result in transferability. This study examined the effect of structur...
متن کاملThe discourse theory of democracy and public sphere in Habermas's ideas
Research and scientific explanation about discourse democracy theory of Jurgen Habermas and studying and evaluating reflection and generalization of his philosophical and epistemological principles are objectives which the researcher follows in this research From this view, there is studied representation of concepts and categories such as cognitive interests, communication action, discoursing...
متن کامل